The current large model market has essentially been divided up. There are now only three independent companies: OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI. OpenAI is valued at tens of billions of dollars, while both Anthropic and xAI are valued at 20 billion dollars each.
The remaining opportunities lie in the commercial development of AI applications on the side of the trend.
Of course it is still early days, but it would be interesting to also compare this strategy map with an initial user perception map, perhaps on different dimensions. It would be a first comparison with the perceptions of differences (if significant) between the different technologies available to the public, and would also serve, perhaps, to investigate the reasons behind choices that are not driven only by technical performance.
I understand your list is not exhaustive, but I'm wondering if there was any reason why you didn't include a major one like Meta's LLaMA?
Good point. I will include it in an updated version of the map soon.
interesting and nicely put
Very useful!
The current large model market has essentially been divided up. There are now only three independent companies: OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI. OpenAI is valued at tens of billions of dollars, while both Anthropic and xAI are valued at 20 billion dollars each.
The remaining opportunities lie in the commercial development of AI applications on the side of the trend.
What about Mistral, G42 & Cohere?
Of course it is still early days, but it would be interesting to also compare this strategy map with an initial user perception map, perhaps on different dimensions. It would be a first comparison with the perceptions of differences (if significant) between the different technologies available to the public, and would also serve, perhaps, to investigate the reasons behind choices that are not driven only by technical performance.
Very helpful insights and thought provoking questions. Thank oyu.
Great insights! Thanks for sharing!